| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| under-the-counter | 0.739 | 97246 |
| highest-rated | 0.722 | 98449 |
| short-pitched | 0.722 | 74238 |
| poorly-paid | 0.720 | 94523 |
| substandard | 0.718 | 31113 |
| short-life | 0.717 | 96010 |
| over-priced | 0.715 | 54550 |
| recession-proof | 0.715 | 74060 |
| man-management | 0.709 | 62352 |
| unsuitable | 0.705 | 7512 |
| uneconomical | 0.701 | 35142 |
| ill-suited | 0.701 | 48767 |
| appaling | 0.700 | 97994 |
| uninsurable | 0.694 | 84468 |
| consumer-good | 0.694 | 94484 |
| time-tabling | 0.689 | 92692 |
| cold-calling | 0.687 | 82404 |
| pernickety | 0.685 | 74610 |
| repairable | 0.684 | 72152 |
| ear-marked | 0.683 | 65805 |
| cost-conscious | 0.683 | 51605 |
| indisciplined | 0.683 | 85445 |
| pilferage | 0.682 | 67696 |
| eukanuba | 0.682 | 69435 |
| poor-quality | 0.682 | 67072 |