| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| success | 0.688 | 805 |
| successfully | 0.667 | 2647 |
| promising | 0.662 | 6306 |
| wimpol | 0.659 | 54173 |
| first-mover | 0.656 | 85269 |
| trialling | 0.642 | 89150 |
| unenviable | 0.641 | 26435 |
| enterprising | 0.640 | 13677 |
| mid-career | 0.638 | 50788 |
| wec | 0.637 | 68922 |
| innovative | 0.633 | 5875 |
| unsuccessful | 0.633 | 6059 |
| g201 | 0.629 | 89810 |
| injury-prone | 0.629 | 99463 |
| paralympics | 0.625 | 84993 |
| consumer-good | 0.623 | 94484 |
| admired | 0.622 | 98106 |
| lucrative | 0.620 | 9021 |
| information-technology | 0.620 | 75466 |
| filmhouse | 0.619 | 85985 |
| untried | 0.617 | 26838 |
| cost-conscious | 0.617 | 51605 |
| gep | 0.616 | 60884 |
| drug-test | 0.615 | 90525 |
| head-start | 0.615 | 81698 |