| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| rvh | 0.812 | 52847 |
| worst-off | 0.800 | 86601 |
| low-pay | 0.797 | 80626 |
| high-cost | 0.784 | 40427 |
| low-skilled | 0.784 | 77171 |
| ex-offender | 0.784 | 72135 |
| high-spend | 0.780 | 45694 |
| remploy | 0.778 | 80494 |
| under-resourced | 0.776 | 64570 |
| crèch | 0.774 | 47354 |
| non-farming | 0.774 | 80035 |
| higher-than-average | 0.771 | 95973 |
| lower-income | 0.770 | 68397 |
| yops | 0.769 | 97702 |
| 12pc | 0.767 | 74800 |
| underfund | 0.767 | 19702 |
| lowest-paid | 0.766 | 86461 |
| underpay | 0.766 | 63252 |
| ill-afford | 0.766 | 83814 |
| fund-holder | 0.765 | 67446 |
| teleworking | 0.764 | 49069 |
| under-utilised | 0.764 | 63070 |
| mid-wale | 0.763 | 64155 |
| appalachia | 0.763 | 59461 |
| feather-bed | 0.763 | 82990 |