SimilarityRank
:_implication_for 0.813 29106
:_evidence_from 0.785 33019
:_lesson_from 0.764 48078
:_a_case_study 0.764 29217
:_an_analysis_of 0.749 53090
:_effect_of 0.683 58148
Dynamics_of 0.672 41413
and_their_implication_for 0.630 88839
and_its_implication_for 0.627 53124
,_Volume_[number]_,_page_[number] 0.624 68032
with_special_reference_to 0.617 54935
:_rethink 0.615 97672
[number]_(_3_)_: 0.615 21266
Project_Title_: 0.614 96486
:_reflection_on 0.613 62177
:_proceeding_of_the 0.609 82887
(_ed_._)_, 0.607 27170
(_3_)_:_[number] 0.603 76282
[number]_(_1_)_: 0.601 18291
Trends_in 0.601 82782
[number]_(_2_)_: 0.598 19490
[_Abstract_] 0.596 69154
(_Ed_._)_, 0.595 20935
(_ed_._) 0.595 37120
(_ed_) 0.595 25176