SimilarityRank
:_insight_from 0.596 98966
:_implication_for 0.573 29106
[number]_(_2_)_: 0.556 19490
:_a_case_study 0.555 29217
[number]_(_4_)_: 0.552 24545
[number]_(_3_)_: 0.552 21266
[number]_(_1_)_: 0.551 18291
Abstract_: 0.547 6250
(_2_)_:_[number] 0.545 68158
Dynamics_of 0.544 41413
,_Volume_[number]_,_page_[number] 0.538 68032
:_an_analysis_of 0.537 53090
:_effect_of 0.534 58148
(_4_)_:_[number] 0.530 89875
:_evidence_from 0.528 33019
(_1_)_:_[number] 0.523 67832
(_3_)_:_[number] 0.521 76282
/_page_[number]_, 0.516 72565
[number]_,_Volume_[number]_, 0.513 87781
,_Volume_[number]_, 0.507 80483
Model_for 0.506 47572
introduction_: 0.506 21337
Analysis_of 0.505 26775
:_lesson_from 0.504 48078
,_pp_[number] 0.502 63918