| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| comparative_study_of | 0.804 | 70010 |
| a_comparison_of | 0.742 | 13637 |
| comparative_analysis_of | 0.728 | 66872 |
| comparison_of | 0.678 | 7662 |
| :_an_analysis_of | 0.675 | 53090 |
| an_analysis_of | 0.668 | 10420 |
| with_special_reference_to | 0.662 | 54935 |
| an_evaluation_of | 0.629 | 26507 |
| comparative_study | 0.611 | 76135 |
| :_effect_of | 0.609 | 58148 |
| a_comparative | 0.602 | 89809 |
| Analysis_of | 0.601 | 26775 |
| a_comparison_between | 0.600 | 68525 |
| evaluation_of | 0.600 | 2999 |
| :_a_case_study | 0.597 | 29217 |
| a_comparison_with | 0.592 | 92435 |
| and_its_effect_on | 0.591 | 30031 |
| Dynamics_of | 0.591 | 41413 |
| a_case_study_of | 0.588 | 51918 |
| and_their_effect_on | 0.585 | 47369 |
| Evaluation_of | 0.585 | 74418 |
| quantitative_analysis_of | 0.583 | 81549 |
| analysis_of | 0.582 | 1723 |
| Comparative | 0.579 | 73094 |
| Characteristics_of | 0.578 | 86460 |