| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| more_flexible | 0.764 | 21612 |
| a_flexible | 0.714 | 15024 |
| great_flexibility | 0.668 | 93696 |
| a_more_robust | 0.639 | 78763 |
| flexible | 0.638 | 3047 |
| more_flexibility | 0.632 | 94208 |
| a_more_efficient | 0.628 | 42459 |
| more_robust | 0.593 | 33562 |
| increase_flexibility | 0.569 | 69673 |
| more_dynamic | 0.569 | 67394 |
| move_towards_a | 0.564 | 63768 |
| flexibility | 0.564 | 2687 |
| more_innovative | 0.559 | 79826 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.555 | 72275 |
| an_alternative | 0.552 | 10730 |
| an_enhanced | 0.551 | 39124 |
| a_more_sustainable | 0.551 | 96942 |
| an_improve | 0.549 | 23083 |
| a_more_comprehensive | 0.546 | 80669 |
| more_stable | 0.541 | 38558 |
| more_efficient | 0.537 | 7315 |
| be_very_flexible | 0.537 | 97669 |
| less_costly | 0.535 | 69576 |
| more_consistent | 0.534 | 68683 |
| flexibly | 0.534 | 81981 |