| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| well-design | 0.748 | 45248 |
| well_design | 0.722 | 25688 |
| a_robust | 0.566 | 16018 |
| an_efficient | 0.545 | 16489 |
| a_comprehensive | 0.542 | 7476 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.541 | 69744 |
| an_effective | 0.534 | 8496 |
| an_integrated | 0.532 | 14182 |
| a_simple | 0.529 | 3183 |
| a_structured | 0.526 | 43386 |
| a_sophisticated | 0.522 | 31165 |
| a_high-quality | 0.518 | 42884 |
| a_customized | 0.507 | 64113 |
| a_stand-alone | 0.503 | 75220 |
| a_flexible | 0.501 | 15024 |
| user-friendly | 0.498 | 21921 |
| an_innovative | 0.497 | 13048 |
| a_modular | 0.495 | 75098 |
| a_standardized | 0.495 | 58163 |
| easy-to-use | 0.494 | 29712 |
| a_scalable | 0.490 | 93692 |
| a_proper | 0.488 | 12145 |
| an_attractive | 0.487 | 21825 |
| an_inexpensive | 0.487 | 61517 |
| well_think_out | 0.485 | 74172 |