| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| affordability_of | 0.795 | 53926 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.619 | 58138 |
| accessibility | 0.612 | 4327 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.600 | 49879 |
| affordable | 0.595 | 3667 |
| cost_efficiency | 0.568 | 76154 |
| ease_of_use | 0.565 | 19645 |
| affordable_price | 0.561 | 69228 |
| more_affordable | 0.560 | 30101 |
| portability | 0.560 | 24714 |
| housing_cost | 0.556 | 73506 |
| low_cost | 0.549 | 7473 |
| livability | 0.545 | 81073 |
| affordable_housing | 0.539 | 9503 |
| reliability | 0.536 | 4617 |
| scalability | 0.533 | 15740 |
| sustainability | 0.530 | 1720 |
| rise_cost | 0.530 | 80081 |
| financial_sustainability | 0.529 | 97815 |
| home_ownership | 0.528 | 49021 |
| quality_of_service | 0.525 | 38504 |
| practicality | 0.523 | 27381 |
| quality | 0.521 | 650 |
| price_point | 0.520 | 44823 |
| social_equity | 0.520 | 71051 |