| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| affordability | 0.795 | 15833 |
| more_affordable | 0.604 | 30101 |
| affordable | 0.591 | 3667 |
| the_high_cost_of | 0.577 | 44018 |
| availability_of | 0.576 | 13495 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.554 | 49879 |
| low_cost | 0.546 | 7473 |
| accessibility | 0.544 | 4327 |
| rise_cost | 0.542 | 80081 |
| the_quality_of | 0.542 | 1284 |
| availability | 0.542 | 4499 |
| provide_affordable | 0.538 | 95082 |
| the_availability_of | 0.535 | 6986 |
| increase_access_to | 0.525 | 41185 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.521 | 58138 |
| quality_of | 0.519 | 4505 |
| the_cost_of | 0.517 | 1168 |
| increase_demand_for | 0.516 | 36018 |
| low-income_household | 0.509 | 91079 |
| expand_access_to | 0.508 | 88972 |
| improve_access | 0.508 | 97654 |
| price_of | 0.506 | 2531 |
| high_price | 0.505 | 16602 |
| high_cost | 0.503 | 23056 |
| affordable_price | 0.502 | 69228 |