| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| affordable | 0.774 | 3667 |
| an_inexpensive | 0.731 | 61517 |
| a_low-cost | 0.714 | 67746 |
| a_low_cost | 0.697 | 52787 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.692 | 69744 |
| reasonably_price | 0.687 | 55852 |
| more_affordable | 0.680 | 30101 |
| at_an_affordable_price_. | 0.667 | 87167 |
| inexpensive | 0.657 | 10926 |
| provide_affordable | 0.638 | 95082 |
| low-cost | 0.626 | 15096 |
| at_affordable_price_. | 0.618 | 65387 |
| at_affordable_price | 0.603 | 86876 |
| a_high-quality | 0.599 | 42884 |
| a_reliable | 0.597 | 13764 |
| cost-effective | 0.597 | 12088 |
| low_cost | 0.580 | 7473 |
| cost_effective | 0.577 | 15101 |
| Affordable | 0.576 | 58979 |
| cost-efficient | 0.573 | 81922 |
| a_premium | 0.569 | 33983 |
| cheap | 0.569 | 1957 |
| a_compact | 0.565 | 29525 |
| an_efficient | 0.565 | 16489 |
| affordable_price | 0.563 | 69228 |