Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
affordable | 0.774 | 3667 |
an_inexpensive | 0.731 | 61517 |
a_low-cost | 0.714 | 67746 |
a_low_cost | 0.697 | 52787 |
a_cost-effective | 0.692 | 69744 |
reasonably_price | 0.687 | 55852 |
more_affordable | 0.680 | 30101 |
at_an_affordable_price_. | 0.667 | 87167 |
inexpensive | 0.657 | 10926 |
provide_affordable | 0.638 | 95082 |
low-cost | 0.626 | 15096 |
at_affordable_price_. | 0.618 | 65387 |
at_affordable_price | 0.603 | 86876 |
a_high-quality | 0.599 | 42884 |
a_reliable | 0.597 | 13764 |
cost-effective | 0.597 | 12088 |
low_cost | 0.580 | 7473 |
cost_effective | 0.577 | 15101 |
Affordable | 0.576 | 58979 |
cost-efficient | 0.573 | 81922 |
a_premium | 0.569 | 33983 |
cheap | 0.569 | 1957 |
a_compact | 0.565 | 29525 |
an_efficient | 0.565 | 16489 |
affordable_price | 0.563 | 69228 |