| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| efficient | 0.809 | 2805 |
| a_more_efficient | 0.736 | 42459 |
| an_effective | 0.729 | 8496 |
| the_most_efficient | 0.710 | 31596 |
| highly_efficient | 0.703 | 40901 |
| a_reliable | 0.691 | 13764 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.665 | 69744 |
| a_robust | 0.663 | 16018 |
| very_efficient | 0.653 | 93713 |
| an_optimal | 0.621 | 62156 |
| an_adequate | 0.614 | 45841 |
| cost-efficient | 0.609 | 81922 |
| more_efficient | 0.603 | 7315 |
| most_efficient | 0.603 | 72519 |
| cost_efficient | 0.603 | 94706 |
| a_scalable | 0.600 | 93692 |
| efficiently | 0.584 | 5666 |
| cost-effective | 0.578 | 12088 |
| robust | 0.577 | 5571 |
| reliable | 0.576 | 3190 |
| a_flexible | 0.573 | 15024 |
| an_accurate | 0.572 | 39691 |
| a_sensible | 0.569 | 57007 |
| a_consistent | 0.567 | 18893 |
| a_versatile | 0.566 | 67779 |