Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
inexpensive | 0.793 | 10926 |
a_low-cost | 0.753 | 67746 |
an_affordable | 0.731 | 35923 |
a_low_cost | 0.700 | 52787 |
cheap | 0.669 | 1957 |
a_cost-effective | 0.653 | 69744 |
low-cost | 0.648 | 15096 |
a_simple | 0.646 | 3183 |
a_portable | 0.630 | 38039 |
less_expensive | 0.617 | 25381 |
reasonably_price | 0.594 | 55852 |
very_cheap | 0.585 | 94283 |
low_cost | 0.577 | 7473 |
an_easy | 0.574 | 11598 |
a_quick | 0.563 | 9542 |
an_expensive | 0.561 | 32864 |
a_reliable | 0.558 | 13764 |
more_affordable | 0.553 | 30101 |
widely_available | 0.548 | 65913 |
use_a_simple | 0.546 | 55152 |
easy-to-use | 0.544 | 29712 |
cost-efficient | 0.541 | 81922 |
cost-effective | 0.540 | 12088 |
affordable | 0.537 | 3667 |
a_lightweight | 0.536 | 36878 |