| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| inexpensive | 0.793 | 10926 |
| a_low-cost | 0.753 | 67746 |
| an_affordable | 0.731 | 35923 |
| a_low_cost | 0.700 | 52787 |
| cheap | 0.669 | 1957 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.653 | 69744 |
| low-cost | 0.648 | 15096 |
| a_simple | 0.646 | 3183 |
| a_portable | 0.630 | 38039 |
| less_expensive | 0.617 | 25381 |
| reasonably_price | 0.594 | 55852 |
| very_cheap | 0.585 | 94283 |
| low_cost | 0.577 | 7473 |
| an_easy | 0.574 | 11598 |
| a_quick | 0.563 | 9542 |
| an_expensive | 0.561 | 32864 |
| a_reliable | 0.558 | 13764 |
| more_affordable | 0.553 | 30101 |
| widely_available | 0.548 | 65913 |
| use_a_simple | 0.546 | 55152 |
| easy-to-use | 0.544 | 29712 |
| cost-efficient | 0.541 | 81922 |
| cost-effective | 0.540 | 12088 |
| affordable | 0.537 | 3667 |
| a_lightweight | 0.536 | 36878 |