| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| easy_to_use | 0.905 | 14474 |
| easy-to-use | 0.816 | 29712 |
| user-friendly | 0.812 | 21921 |
| user_friendly | 0.807 | 26839 |
| be_easy_to_use | 0.804 | 33598 |
| it_be_easy_to_use | 0.731 | 80387 |
| and_easy_to_understand | 0.687 | 73421 |
| easy_to_install | 0.683 | 64618 |
| an_easy_to_use | 0.673 | 63883 |
| intuitive | 0.652 | 11817 |
| cost_effective | 0.620 | 15101 |
| inexpensive | 0.617 | 10926 |
| convenient | 0.613 | 5972 |
| easy_to_read | 0.610 | 68877 |
| easy_to_understand | 0.608 | 50534 |
| more_intuitive | 0.598 | 97210 |
| simple | 0.597 | 841 |
| versatile | 0.595 | 11816 |
| it_be_simple | 0.593 | 20960 |
| efficient | 0.593 | 2805 |
| portable | 0.593 | 7855 |
| ease_of_use | 0.590 | 19645 |
| very_easy | 0.589 | 42069 |
| cost-effective | 0.584 | 12088 |
| easy | 0.583 | 1122 |