| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| effectiveness | 0.770 | 5254 |
| the_effectiveness_of | 0.766 | 9595 |
| effectiveness_of | 0.750 | 32347 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.705 | 58080 |
| their_effectiveness | 0.683 | 65235 |
| the_efficacy_of | 0.674 | 20536 |
| its_effectiveness | 0.651 | 59159 |
| efficiency_of | 0.647 | 5753 |
| efficacy | 0.621 | 12475 |
| efficacy_of | 0.612 | 59785 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.599 | 58138 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.593 | 49879 |
| the_usefulness_of | 0.586 | 34775 |
| evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.585 | 80821 |
| acceptability_of | 0.585 | 72135 |
| responsiveness_of | 0.584 | 84545 |
| acceptability | 0.584 | 60504 |
| relevance_of | 0.583 | 34610 |
| feasibility | 0.571 | 20901 |
| and_validity_of | 0.559 | 92780 |
| efficiency | 0.558 | 2199 |
| usefulness | 0.556 | 26552 |
| quality_of | 0.550 | 4505 |
| impact_of | 0.548 | 6260 |
| credibility_of | 0.547 | 91014 |