| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
efficacy
|
0.831 |
12475 |
|
the_efficacy_of
|
0.802 |
20536 |
|
efficacy_of
|
0.751 |
59785 |
|
and_effectiveness_of
|
0.705 |
67700 |
|
the_effectiveness_of
|
0.684 |
9595 |
|
effectiveness
|
0.684 |
5254 |
|
effectiveness_of
|
0.672 |
32347 |
|
its_effectiveness
|
0.606 |
59159 |
|
their_effectiveness
|
0.605 |
65235 |
|
acceptability_of
|
0.603 |
72135 |
|
and_validity_of
|
0.603 |
92780 |
|
randomize_controlled_trial
|
0.599 |
81810 |
|
the_usefulness_of
|
0.578 |
34775 |
|
acceptability
|
0.578 |
60504 |
|
feasibility
|
0.575 |
20901 |
|
cost-effectiveness
|
0.561 |
49879 |
|
clinical_study
|
0.561 |
25548 |
|
clinical_outcome
|
0.559 |
48453 |
|
safety
|
0.545 |
757 |
|
in_patient_with
|
0.543 |
20903 |
|
evaluate_the_effectiveness_of
|
0.542 |
80821 |
|
relevance_of
|
0.542 |
34610 |
|
efficiency_of
|
0.540 |
5753 |
|
pharmacokinetic
|
0.538 |
83994 |
|
the_feasibility_of
|
0.536 |
31863 |