| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| at_a_low_cost | 0.838 | 57241 |
| low_cost | 0.734 | 7473 |
| at_low_price | 0.679 | 84536 |
| reduce_cost | 0.671 | 15420 |
| cheaply | 0.658 | 44617 |
| at_an_affordable_price_. | 0.634 | 87167 |
| at_affordable_price | 0.620 | 86876 |
| at_a_fraction_of_the | 0.603 | 68098 |
| low-cost | 0.602 | 15096 |
| a_low_cost | 0.595 | 52787 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.589 | 72275 |
| less_costly | 0.588 | 69576 |
| less_expensive | 0.583 | 25381 |
| cost_effective | 0.579 | 15101 |
| at_affordable_price_. | 0.578 | 65387 |
| cheap | 0.576 | 1957 |
| more_efficiently | 0.575 | 19634 |
| cost-effective | 0.567 | 12088 |
| inexpensive | 0.566 | 10926 |
| more_affordable | 0.565 | 30101 |
| affordable_price | 0.564 | 69228 |
| cost-efficient | 0.562 | 81922 |
| a_low_price | 0.562 | 47936 |
| affordable | 0.556 | 3667 |
| low_price | 0.545 | 11233 |