| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| more_effective | 0.742 | 8517 |
| be_more_effective_than | 0.710 | 71030 |
| be_more_successful | 0.669 | 92982 |
| more_effectively | 0.668 | 13061 |
| less_effective | 0.637 | 94770 |
| effective | 0.636 | 1124 |
| most_effective | 0.632 | 18051 |
| can_be_effective | 0.624 | 66862 |
| be_highly_effective | 0.624 | 67544 |
| be_very_effective | 0.598 | 62547 |
| be_not_effective | 0.593 | 58885 |
| be_ineffective | 0.587 | 38568 |
| more_efficient | 0.586 | 7315 |
| the_most_effective | 0.567 | 11159 |
| most_effectively | 0.566 | 66592 |
| be_more_productive | 0.565 | 66372 |
| an_effective | 0.559 | 8496 |
| more_efficiently | 0.559 | 19634 |
| effectively_use | 0.540 | 46276 |
| more_successful | 0.539 | 34904 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.539 | 72275 |
| be_well_able_to | 0.532 | 70096 |
| develop_effective | 0.528 | 84374 |
| be_beneficial | 0.523 | 34149 |
| improve_outcome | 0.516 | 63020 |