| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| be_more_effective | 0.710 | 23128 |
| be_not_effective | 0.681 | 58885 |
| be_ineffective | 0.659 | 38568 |
| can_be_effective | 0.648 | 66862 |
| be_highly_effective | 0.628 | 67544 |
| be_very_effective | 0.603 | 62547 |
| be_good_than | 0.573 | 10307 |
| less_effective | 0.571 | 94770 |
| most_effective | 0.571 | 18051 |
| be_preferable_to | 0.561 | 65975 |
| superior_to | 0.559 | 15611 |
| the_efficacy_of | 0.532 | 20536 |
| effectiveness_of | 0.528 | 32347 |
| more_effective | 0.527 | 8517 |
| effective | 0.525 | 1124 |
| the_effectiveness_of | 0.522 | 9595 |
| the_most_effective | 0.517 | 11159 |
| be_beneficial | 0.500 | 34149 |
| highly_effective | 0.497 | 35554 |
| have_no_effect_on | 0.493 | 45720 |
| well_than | 0.491 | 14633 |
| so_effective | 0.483 | 60156 |
| ineffective | 0.482 | 17095 |
| efficacy_of | 0.478 | 59785 |
| do_more_harm_than_good | 0.476 | 97261 |