| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| be_cheap_than | 0.799 | 74092 |
| cheap | 0.741 | 1957 |
| less_expensive | 0.741 | 25381 |
| more_expensive | 0.704 | 15821 |
| be_more_expensive | 0.689 | 50628 |
| very_cheap | 0.663 | 94283 |
| it_be_cheap | 0.654 | 47659 |
| cost_more_than | 0.649 | 91780 |
| more_economical | 0.635 | 84513 |
| less_costly | 0.614 | 69576 |
| more_affordable | 0.606 | 30101 |
| easy_than | 0.595 | 83531 |
| pricey | 0.594 | 35908 |
| just_as_good | 0.593 | 48157 |
| be_not_cheap | 0.587 | 70887 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.585 | 72275 |
| at_a_fraction_of_the | 0.585 | 68098 |
| more_costly | 0.580 | 72633 |
| inexpensive | 0.578 | 10926 |
| good_than | 0.574 | 10013 |
| be_too_expensive | 0.568 | 70745 |
| cost_more | 0.566 | 44255 |
| low_price | 0.552 | 11233 |
| well_than | 0.547 | 14633 |
| be_very_expensive | 0.547 | 46351 |