| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
comparative_analysis_of
|
0.807 |
66872 |
|
a_comparative_study_of
|
0.804 |
74598 |
|
comparative_study
|
0.774 |
76135 |
|
comparison_of
|
0.712 |
7662 |
|
comparative
|
0.668 |
16892 |
|
analysis_of
|
0.667 |
1723 |
|
a_comparison_of
|
0.658 |
13637 |
|
quantitative_analysis_of
|
0.644 |
81549 |
|
with_special_reference_to
|
0.643 |
54935 |
|
a_comparative
|
0.639 |
89809 |
|
an_analysis_of
|
0.631 |
10420 |
|
Comparative
|
0.627 |
73094 |
|
evaluation_of
|
0.625 |
2999 |
|
comparison_between
|
0.607 |
23463 |
|
research_project_on
|
0.603 |
97941 |
|
comparative_analysis
|
0.591 |
71955 |
|
and_their_implication_for
|
0.585 |
88839 |
|
study_focus_on
|
0.585 |
57165 |
|
research_on
|
0.582 |
3939 |
|
study_examine
|
0.582 |
53691 |
|
a_comparison_with
|
0.578 |
92435 |
|
:_an_analysis_of
|
0.577 |
53090 |
|
evolution_of
|
0.574 |
12173 |
|
and_their_effect_on
|
0.574 |
47369 |
|
and_their_relation_to
|
0.572 |
97318 |