Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
comparative_analysis_of | 0.807 | 66872 |
a_comparative_study_of | 0.804 | 74598 |
comparative_study | 0.774 | 76135 |
comparison_of | 0.712 | 7662 |
comparative | 0.668 | 16892 |
analysis_of | 0.667 | 1723 |
a_comparison_of | 0.658 | 13637 |
quantitative_analysis_of | 0.644 | 81549 |
with_special_reference_to | 0.643 | 54935 |
a_comparative | 0.639 | 89809 |
an_analysis_of | 0.631 | 10420 |
Comparative | 0.627 | 73094 |
evaluation_of | 0.625 | 2999 |
comparison_between | 0.607 | 23463 |
research_project_on | 0.603 | 97941 |
comparative_analysis | 0.591 | 71955 |
and_their_implication_for | 0.585 | 88839 |
study_focus_on | 0.585 | 57165 |
research_on | 0.582 | 3939 |
study_examine | 0.582 | 53691 |
a_comparison_with | 0.578 | 92435 |
:_an_analysis_of | 0.577 | 53090 |
evolution_of | 0.574 | 12173 |
and_their_effect_on | 0.574 | 47369 |
and_their_relation_to | 0.572 | 97318 |