| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| cost_effectiveness | 0.878 | 58138 |
| cost_efficiency | 0.766 | 76154 |
| effectiveness | 0.705 | 5254 |
| efficiency | 0.684 | 2199 |
| cost_saving | 0.677 | 17397 |
| efficacy | 0.663 | 12475 |
| feasibility | 0.663 | 20901 |
| economic_efficiency | 0.656 | 77477 |
| reliability | 0.644 | 4617 |
| cost_reduction | 0.616 | 37456 |
| cost_analysis | 0.611 | 86367 |
| affordability | 0.600 | 15833 |
| timeliness | 0.600 | 42981 |
| reduce_cost | 0.599 | 15420 |
| quality_of_care | 0.598 | 41370 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.593 | 67700 |
| operational_efficiency | 0.591 | 54519 |
| acceptability | 0.582 | 60504 |
| ease_of_use | 0.577 | 19645 |
| efficiency_of | 0.576 | 5753 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.575 | 26264 |
| control_cost | 0.569 | 80922 |
| low_cost | 0.568 | 7473 |
| scalability | 0.567 | 15740 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.565 | 31393 |