Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
viable | 0.718 | 13505 |
sustainable | 0.718 | 2965 |
environmentally_sound | 0.686 | 91157 |
more_sustainable | 0.643 | 25970 |
feasible | 0.638 | 16338 |
profitable | 0.627 | 8325 |
cost_effective | 0.622 | 15101 |
cost-effective | 0.607 | 12088 |
a_sustainable | 0.606 | 13754 |
a_viable | 0.600 | 31931 |
cost_efficient | 0.597 | 94706 |
cost-efficient | 0.591 | 81922 |
environmentally_friendly | 0.590 | 19984 |
be_viable | 0.589 | 43704 |
environmentally | 0.584 | 34696 |
more_cost-effective | 0.574 | 72275 |
replicable | 0.567 | 77622 |
marketable | 0.558 | 65527 |
more_profitable | 0.553 | 51706 |
economically | 0.553 | 9243 |
practicable | 0.547 | 87494 |
more_economical | 0.544 | 84513 |
ecologically | 0.544 | 62833 |
a_more_sustainable | 0.542 | 96942 |
alternative_energy_source | 0.541 | 77620 |