| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| viable | 0.718 | 13505 |
| sustainable | 0.718 | 2965 |
| environmentally_sound | 0.686 | 91157 |
| more_sustainable | 0.643 | 25970 |
| feasible | 0.638 | 16338 |
| profitable | 0.627 | 8325 |
| cost_effective | 0.622 | 15101 |
| cost-effective | 0.607 | 12088 |
| a_sustainable | 0.606 | 13754 |
| a_viable | 0.600 | 31931 |
| cost_efficient | 0.597 | 94706 |
| cost-efficient | 0.591 | 81922 |
| environmentally_friendly | 0.590 | 19984 |
| be_viable | 0.589 | 43704 |
| environmentally | 0.584 | 34696 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.574 | 72275 |
| replicable | 0.567 | 77622 |
| marketable | 0.558 | 65527 |
| more_profitable | 0.553 | 51706 |
| economically | 0.553 | 9243 |
| practicable | 0.547 | 87494 |
| more_economical | 0.544 | 84513 |
| ecologically | 0.544 | 62833 |
| a_more_sustainable | 0.542 | 96942 |
| alternative_energy_source | 0.541 | 77620 |