| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| efficacy | 0.778 | 12475 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.770 | 67700 |
| their_effectiveness | 0.743 | 65235 |
| its_effectiveness | 0.738 | 59159 |
| the_effectiveness_of | 0.737 | 9595 |
| effectiveness_of | 0.722 | 32347 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.705 | 49879 |
| efficiency | 0.688 | 2199 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.687 | 58138 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.684 | 58080 |
| usefulness | 0.681 | 26552 |
| the_efficacy_of | 0.654 | 20536 |
| efficiency_of | 0.652 | 5753 |
| efficacy_of | 0.612 | 59785 |
| Effectiveness | 0.611 | 80649 |
| cost_efficiency | 0.600 | 76154 |
| reliability | 0.592 | 4617 |
| relevance | 0.582 | 9250 |
| credibility_of | 0.579 | 91014 |
| acceptability | 0.573 | 60504 |
| feasibility | 0.570 | 20901 |
| timeliness | 0.565 | 42981 |
| responsiveness | 0.563 | 26987 |
| applicability | 0.562 | 44277 |
| relevance_of | 0.560 | 34610 |