| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| the_effectiveness_of | 0.845 | 9595 |
| efficacy_of | 0.812 | 59785 |
| the_efficacy_of | 0.765 | 20536 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.750 | 67700 |
| effectiveness | 0.722 | 5254 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.672 | 58080 |
| impact_of | 0.671 | 6260 |
| their_effectiveness | 0.667 | 65235 |
| effect_of | 0.661 | 4061 |
| its_effectiveness | 0.659 | 59159 |
| evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.648 | 80821 |
| efficiency_of | 0.648 | 5753 |
| efficacy | 0.629 | 12475 |
| Effectiveness | 0.610 | 80649 |
| the_usefulness_of | 0.607 | 34775 |
| evaluation_of | 0.602 | 2999 |
| utilization_of | 0.600 | 12980 |
| acceptability_of | 0.599 | 72135 |
| the_effect_of | 0.582 | 1931 |
| the_impact_of | 0.573 | 2285 |
| :_effect_of | 0.571 | 58148 |
| an_evaluation_of | 0.565 | 26507 |
| applicability_of | 0.563 | 77277 |
| relevance_of | 0.550 | 34610 |
| Evaluation_of | 0.549 | 74418 |