| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| effective_use_of | 0.743 | 24703 |
| utilization_of | 0.691 | 12980 |
| utilisation_of | 0.645 | 45419 |
| optimization_of | 0.609 | 18256 |
| optimisation_of | 0.597 | 52782 |
| sustainable_use_of | 0.594 | 72293 |
| efficiency_of | 0.592 | 5753 |
| efficient | 0.589 | 2805 |
| proper_use_of | 0.579 | 44442 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.578 | 26264 |
| responsible_use_of | 0.577 | 91345 |
| utilization | 0.576 | 15461 |
| allocation_of | 0.570 | 17253 |
| usage_of | 0.564 | 7761 |
| effective_management_of | 0.563 | 68991 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.556 | 31393 |
| more_efficient | 0.552 | 7315 |
| maximize | 0.546 | 8933 |
| effectively_use | 0.541 | 46276 |
| cost-efficient | 0.536 | 81922 |
| efficiency | 0.535 | 2199 |
| great_efficiency | 0.527 | 84913 |
| scarce_resource | 0.526 | 56700 |
| optimize | 0.524 | 4825 |
| limited_resource | 0.516 | 29018 |