Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
effective_use_of | 0.743 | 24703 |
utilization_of | 0.691 | 12980 |
utilisation_of | 0.645 | 45419 |
optimization_of | 0.609 | 18256 |
optimisation_of | 0.597 | 52782 |
sustainable_use_of | 0.594 | 72293 |
efficiency_of | 0.592 | 5753 |
efficient | 0.589 | 2805 |
proper_use_of | 0.579 | 44442 |
increase_efficiency | 0.578 | 26264 |
responsible_use_of | 0.577 | 91345 |
utilization | 0.576 | 15461 |
allocation_of | 0.570 | 17253 |
usage_of | 0.564 | 7761 |
effective_management_of | 0.563 | 68991 |
improve_efficiency | 0.556 | 31393 |
more_efficient | 0.552 | 7315 |
maximize | 0.546 | 8933 |
effectively_use | 0.541 | 46276 |
cost-efficient | 0.536 | 81922 |
efficiency | 0.535 | 2199 |
great_efficiency | 0.527 | 84913 |
scarce_resource | 0.526 | 56700 |
optimize | 0.524 | 4825 |
limited_resource | 0.516 | 29018 |