| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| ecologically | 0.795 | 62833 |
| economically | 0.710 | 9243 |
| socially | 0.706 | 9016 |
| environmentally_sound | 0.696 | 91157 |
| environmentally_friendly | 0.679 | 19984 |
| culturally | 0.614 | 15209 |
| environmentally-friendly | 0.606 | 98360 |
| technologically | 0.601 | 55272 |
| socially_responsible | 0.595 | 51971 |
| eco-friendly | 0.593 | 22425 |
| economically_viable | 0.584 | 75780 |
| morally | 0.580 | 26879 |
| ethically | 0.579 | 38890 |
| politically | 0.577 | 8502 |
| '_green | 0.568 | 31306 |
| sustainable | 0.566 | 2965 |
| scientifically | 0.563 | 30786 |
| aesthetically | 0.558 | 51895 |
| environmental_impact | 0.553 | 13807 |
| biologically | 0.550 | 56157 |
| sustainably | 0.548 | 37665 |
| sustainable_practice | 0.542 | 50682 |
| more_sustainable | 0.536 | 25970 |
| energy_efficient | 0.535 | 29579 |
| financially | 0.534 | 11087 |