| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| environmentally_friendly | 0.757 | 19984 |
| environmentally-friendly | 0.719 | 98360 |
| sustainable | 0.704 | 2965 |
| environmentally | 0.696 | 34696 |
| economically_viable | 0.686 | 75780 |
| eco-friendly | 0.646 | 22425 |
| cost-efficient | 0.633 | 81922 |
| more_sustainable | 0.632 | 25970 |
| energy_efficient | 0.619 | 29579 |
| socially_responsible | 0.619 | 51971 |
| sustainable_practice | 0.618 | 50682 |
| cost-effective | 0.616 | 12088 |
| cost_effective | 0.609 | 15101 |
| cost_efficient | 0.600 | 94706 |
| a_sustainable | 0.594 | 13754 |
| energy-efficient | 0.590 | 52317 |
| a_more_sustainable | 0.589 | 96942 |
| reduce_greenhouse_gas_emission | 0.580 | 57109 |
| ecologically | 0.579 | 62833 |
| environmental_sustainability | 0.571 | 17668 |
| sustainably | 0.565 | 37665 |
| efficient | 0.561 | 2805 |
| '_green | 0.560 | 31306 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.559 | 72275 |
| green_technology | 0.559 | 39391 |