| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
environmentally_friendly
|
0.757 |
19984 |
|
environmentally-friendly
|
0.719 |
98360 |
|
sustainable
|
0.704 |
2965 |
|
environmentally
|
0.696 |
34696 |
|
economically_viable
|
0.686 |
75780 |
|
eco-friendly
|
0.646 |
22425 |
|
cost-efficient
|
0.633 |
81922 |
|
more_sustainable
|
0.632 |
25970 |
|
energy_efficient
|
0.619 |
29579 |
|
socially_responsible
|
0.619 |
51971 |
|
sustainable_practice
|
0.618 |
50682 |
|
cost-effective
|
0.616 |
12088 |
|
cost_effective
|
0.609 |
15101 |
|
cost_efficient
|
0.600 |
94706 |
|
a_sustainable
|
0.594 |
13754 |
|
energy-efficient
|
0.590 |
52317 |
|
a_more_sustainable
|
0.589 |
96942 |
|
reduce_greenhouse_gas_emission
|
0.580 |
57109 |
|
ecologically
|
0.579 |
62833 |
|
environmental_sustainability
|
0.571 |
17668 |
|
sustainably
|
0.565 |
37665 |
|
efficient
|
0.561 |
2805 |
|
'_green
|
0.560 |
31306 |
|
more_cost-effective
|
0.559 |
72275 |
|
green_technology
|
0.559 |
39391 |