| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| the_feasibility_of | 0.747 | 31863 |
| feasibility_study | 0.696 | 24220 |
| a_feasibility_study | 0.664 | 94915 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.663 | 49879 |
| acceptability | 0.648 | 60504 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.642 | 58138 |
| acceptability_of | 0.628 | 72135 |
| pilot_study | 0.616 | 46260 |
| applicability | 0.605 | 44277 |
| cost_analysis | 0.604 | 86367 |
| efficacy | 0.604 | 12475 |
| viability | 0.601 | 24164 |
| appropriateness | 0.588 | 61053 |
| evaluation_of | 0.576 | 2999 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.575 | 58080 |
| suitability | 0.572 | 41243 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.571 | 67700 |
| the_viability_of | 0.570 | 32346 |
| effectiveness | 0.570 | 5254 |
| to_evaluate | 0.568 | 4191 |
| the_appropriateness_of | 0.564 | 61474 |
| applicability_of | 0.562 | 77277 |
| a_pilot_study | 0.561 | 77809 |
| an_evaluation_of | 0.554 | 26507 |
| the_suitability_of | 0.552 | 56520 |