| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| good_practice_for | 0.789 | 16320 |
| share_good_practice | 0.715 | 47481 |
| and_share_good_practice | 0.697 | 71268 |
| innovative_practice | 0.689 | 92438 |
| effective_practice | 0.689 | 88912 |
| Best_Practices | 0.677 | 50106 |
| good_Practices | 0.675 | 82510 |
| to_share_good_practice | 0.672 | 78467 |
| lesson_learn | 0.640 | 10017 |
| Best_Practice | 0.610 | 98855 |
| bad_practice | 0.605 | 88467 |
| current_practice | 0.588 | 27687 |
| evidence-based_practice | 0.583 | 53063 |
| common_practice | 0.574 | 73268 |
| industry_practice | 0.573 | 89146 |
| good_management_practice | 0.572 | 77172 |
| guideline | 0.571 | 2162 |
| common_challenge | 0.568 | 99524 |
| case_study | 0.557 | 3221 |
| success_storey | 0.554 | 19480 |
| innovative_approach | 0.546 | 48256 |
| share_experience | 0.544 | 19277 |
| lesson_learn_from | 0.541 | 23494 |
| common_issue | 0.541 | 90970 |
| key_principle | 0.539 | 98680 |