| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| high_performance | 0.625 | 12154 |
| high-performance | 0.617 | 27703 |
| best-in-class | 0.588 | 97072 |
| high-quality | 0.527 | 8965 |
| high-impact | 0.514 | 71930 |
| highly_effective | 0.507 | 35554 |
| innovative | 0.505 | 2313 |
| scalable | 0.505 | 14958 |
| next-generation | 0.505 | 35620 |
| cost-efficient | 0.497 | 81922 |
| highly_efficient | 0.490 | 40901 |
| data-driven | 0.487 | 60895 |
| cost-effective | 0.487 | 12088 |
| High_Performance | 0.476 | 51832 |
| most_innovative | 0.475 | 84939 |
| performance_metric | 0.475 | 67639 |
| perform_well | 0.473 | 25961 |
| improve_performance | 0.472 | 24490 |
| energy-efficient | 0.472 | 52317 |
| energy_efficient | 0.470 | 29579 |
| highly_competitive | 0.468 | 57774 |
| efficient | 0.467 | 2805 |
| high-end | 0.464 | 20538 |
| more_competitive | 0.464 | 45440 |
| high_potential | 0.462 | 65867 |