| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
highly_efficient
|
0.713 |
40901 |
|
high_reliability
|
0.699 |
88443 |
|
efficiency
|
0.691 |
2199 |
|
high_performance
|
0.659 |
12154 |
|
great_efficiency
|
0.651 |
84913 |
|
energy_saving
|
0.631 |
17268 |
|
low_emission
|
0.630 |
91447 |
|
energy_efficient
|
0.621 |
29579 |
|
improve_efficiency
|
0.614 |
31393 |
|
low_cost
|
0.614 |
7473 |
|
increase_efficiency
|
0.613 |
26264 |
|
cost_reduction
|
0.613 |
37456 |
|
energy-efficient
|
0.609 |
52317 |
|
reduce_energy_consumption
|
0.607 |
81333 |
|
power_consumption
|
0.583 |
30198 |
|
more_efficient
|
0.581 |
7315 |
|
cost_efficiency
|
0.580 |
76154 |
|
high-performance
|
0.578 |
27703 |
|
low_voltage
|
0.577 |
93063 |
|
high_capacity
|
0.577 |
59330 |
|
high_power
|
0.577 |
32763 |
|
efficiency_of
|
0.575 |
5753 |
|
low_power
|
0.575 |
51065 |
|
the_most_efficient
|
0.571 |
31596 |
|
improve_energy_efficiency
|
0.570 |
77201 |