| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| highly_efficient | 0.713 | 40901 |
| high_reliability | 0.699 | 88443 |
| efficiency | 0.691 | 2199 |
| high_performance | 0.659 | 12154 |
| great_efficiency | 0.651 | 84913 |
| energy_saving | 0.631 | 17268 |
| low_emission | 0.630 | 91447 |
| energy_efficient | 0.621 | 29579 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.614 | 31393 |
| low_cost | 0.614 | 7473 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.613 | 26264 |
| cost_reduction | 0.613 | 37456 |
| energy-efficient | 0.609 | 52317 |
| reduce_energy_consumption | 0.607 | 81333 |
| power_consumption | 0.583 | 30198 |
| more_efficient | 0.581 | 7315 |
| cost_efficiency | 0.580 | 76154 |
| high-performance | 0.578 | 27703 |
| low_voltage | 0.577 | 93063 |
| high_capacity | 0.577 | 59330 |
| high_power | 0.577 | 32763 |
| efficiency_of | 0.575 | 5753 |
| low_power | 0.575 | 51065 |
| the_most_efficient | 0.571 | 31596 |
| improve_energy_efficiency | 0.570 | 77201 |