| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| very_effective | 0.745 | 61472 |
| be_highly_effective | 0.736 | 67544 |
| effective | 0.718 | 1124 |
| the_most_effective | 0.647 | 11159 |
| an_effective | 0.645 | 8496 |
| be_very_effective | 0.627 | 62547 |
| so_effective | 0.611 | 60156 |
| proven | 0.600 | 14214 |
| more_effective | 0.598 | 8517 |
| most_effective | 0.598 | 18051 |
| highly_efficient | 0.595 | 40901 |
| potent | 0.594 | 25822 |
| cost-effective | 0.581 | 12088 |
| efficient | 0.578 | 2805 |
| a_proven | 0.574 | 77007 |
| efficacious | 0.567 | 96741 |
| cost_effective | 0.566 | 15101 |
| cost-efficient | 0.552 | 81922 |
| ineffective | 0.551 | 17095 |
| can_be_effective | 0.542 | 66862 |
| powerful | 0.541 | 1990 |
| very_efficient | 0.539 | 93713 |
| easy-to-use | 0.535 | 29712 |
| innovative | 0.531 | 2313 |
| be_not_effective | 0.530 | 58885 |