| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| ineffective | 0.759 | 17095 |
| wasteful | 0.740 | 30506 |
| cumbersome | 0.689 | 25922 |
| inadequate | 0.665 | 12335 |
| inefficiency | 0.663 | 19400 |
| outdated | 0.654 | 15753 |
| antiquated | 0.645 | 47764 |
| unproductive | 0.644 | 45940 |
| unreliable | 0.643 | 25117 |
| costly | 0.639 | 6908 |
| dysfunctional | 0.639 | 27968 |
| insufficient | 0.618 | 17276 |
| expensive | 0.610 | 4273 |
| inconsistent | 0.608 | 21747 |
| inept | 0.602 | 69574 |
| unsustainable | 0.597 | 30274 |
| inflexible | 0.592 | 48041 |
| burdensome | 0.590 | 53080 |
| unnecessary | 0.588 | 7329 |
| useless | 0.585 | 9680 |
| redundant | 0.580 | 14915 |
| unwieldy | 0.578 | 73366 |
| impractical | 0.578 | 62248 |
| ineffectual | 0.576 | 68362 |
| more_efficient | 0.574 | 7315 |