| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| an_inexpensive | 0.793 | 61517 |
| low-cost | 0.790 | 15096 |
| cheap | 0.788 | 1957 |
| affordable | 0.730 | 3667 |
| low_cost | 0.724 | 7473 |
| reasonably_price | 0.713 | 55852 |
| less_expensive | 0.713 | 25381 |
| cost-effective | 0.699 | 12088 |
| cost_effective | 0.698 | 15101 |
| very_cheap | 0.687 | 94283 |
| a_low-cost | 0.676 | 67746 |
| cost-efficient | 0.671 | 81922 |
| widely_available | 0.666 | 65913 |
| a_low_cost | 0.658 | 52787 |
| an_affordable | 0.657 | 35923 |
| more_affordable | 0.656 | 30101 |
| less_costly | 0.646 | 69576 |
| readily_available | 0.638 | 23848 |
| and_easy_to_use | 0.617 | 20816 |
| easily_available | 0.615 | 93615 |
| easy_to_use | 0.610 | 14474 |
| easy-to-use | 0.609 | 29712 |
| more_economical | 0.606 | 84513 |
| cheaply | 0.605 | 44617 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.605 | 69744 |