Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
less_costly | 0.871 | 69576 |
more_expensive | 0.813 | 15821 |
more_economical | 0.801 | 84513 |
more_affordable | 0.797 | 30101 |
more_cost-effective | 0.780 | 72275 |
cheap | 0.761 | 1957 |
more_costly | 0.761 | 72633 |
be_more_expensive | 0.745 | 50628 |
cheap_than | 0.741 | 56432 |
inexpensive | 0.713 | 10926 |
be_cheap_than | 0.681 | 74092 |
low_cost | 0.671 | 7473 |
more_efficient | 0.671 | 7315 |
more_convenient | 0.653 | 35407 |
it_be_cheap | 0.649 | 47659 |
more_durable | 0.644 | 71136 |
cost_effective | 0.642 | 15101 |
a_low_cost | 0.637 | 52787 |
more_reliable | 0.637 | 30134 |
cost-effective | 0.629 | 12088 |
expensive | 0.628 | 4273 |
pricey | 0.628 | 35908 |
cost_more | 0.625 | 44255 |
cost-efficient | 0.621 | 81922 |
an_inexpensive | 0.617 | 61517 |