| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| less_expensive | 0.797 | 25381 |
| affordable | 0.791 | 3667 |
| more_expensive | 0.732 | 15821 |
| cheap | 0.711 | 1957 |
| less_costly | 0.707 | 69576 |
| an_affordable | 0.680 | 35923 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.680 | 72275 |
| more_accessible | 0.666 | 22650 |
| more_economical | 0.663 | 84513 |
| inexpensive | 0.656 | 10926 |
| low_cost | 0.637 | 7473 |
| reasonably_price | 0.626 | 55852 |
| more_costly | 0.622 | 72633 |
| low-cost | 0.619 | 15096 |
| more_appealing | 0.614 | 85838 |
| pricey | 0.612 | 35908 |
| be_more_expensive | 0.608 | 50628 |
| cheap_than | 0.606 | 56432 |
| affordability_of | 0.604 | 53926 |
| more_attractive | 0.604 | 31047 |
| widely_available | 0.603 | 65913 |
| more_convenient | 0.601 | 35407 |
| cost-effective | 0.593 | 12088 |
| a_low_cost | 0.590 | 52787 |
| at_a_low_cost | 0.586 | 57241 |