| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| competitive | 0.717 | 4469 |
| more_attractive | 0.660 | 31047 |
| more_efficient | 0.640 | 7315 |
| highly_competitive | 0.600 | 57774 |
| more_sustainable | 0.599 | 25970 |
| more_innovative | 0.593 | 79826 |
| a_competitive | 0.590 | 23406 |
| more_profitable | 0.589 | 51706 |
| more_transparent | 0.586 | 39889 |
| the_competitiveness_of | 0.584 | 25160 |
| more_productive | 0.576 | 27169 |
| more_affordable | 0.572 | 30101 |
| more_flexible | 0.571 | 21612 |
| more_successful | 0.565 | 34904 |
| more_appealing | 0.565 | 85838 |
| increase_competition | 0.561 | 72699 |
| more_dynamic | 0.561 | 67394 |
| more_responsive | 0.557 | 85647 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.556 | 72275 |
| more_diverse | 0.550 | 46820 |
| smarter | 0.549 | 32662 |
| less_costly | 0.546 | 69576 |
| more_resilient | 0.544 | 74350 |
| more_stable | 0.536 | 38558 |
| less_expensive | 0.534 | 25381 |