Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
less_costly | 0.800 | 69576 |
less_expensive | 0.780 | 25381 |
more_efficient | 0.756 | 7315 |
cost-effective | 0.751 | 12088 |
cost_effective | 0.744 | 15101 |
more_economical | 0.740 | 84513 |
more_effective | 0.731 | 8517 |
cost-efficient | 0.714 | 81922 |
cost_efficient | 0.711 | 94706 |
more_affordable | 0.680 | 30101 |
a_cost-effective | 0.671 | 69744 |
more_costly | 0.671 | 72633 |
more_reliable | 0.658 | 30134 |
a_more_efficient | 0.643 | 42459 |
more_expensive | 0.637 | 15821 |
more_convenient | 0.634 | 35407 |
reduce_cost | 0.632 | 15420 |
low_cost | 0.630 | 7473 |
more_profitable | 0.619 | 51706 |
more_innovative | 0.616 | 79826 |
more_sustainable | 0.610 | 25970 |
a_low_cost | 0.604 | 52787 |
at_a_low_cost | 0.603 | 57241 |
more_durable | 0.603 | 71136 |
cheap | 0.598 | 1957 |