| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| durable | 0.710 | 8136 |
| last_longer | 0.665 | 57045 |
| less_costly | 0.651 | 69576 |
| less_expensive | 0.644 | 25381 |
| more_reliable | 0.617 | 30134 |
| long_lasting | 0.613 | 32214 |
| sturdy | 0.607 | 17073 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.603 | 72275 |
| more_economical | 0.602 | 84513 |
| more_robust | 0.599 | 33562 |
| more_stable | 0.597 | 38558 |
| durability | 0.594 | 11517 |
| more_expensive | 0.592 | 15821 |
| light_weight | 0.590 | 29833 |
| long-lasting | 0.587 | 27310 |
| more_flexible | 0.577 | 21612 |
| than_conventional | 0.575 | 85768 |
| more_costly | 0.568 | 72633 |
| more_efficient | 0.565 | 7315 |
| more_effective | 0.564 | 8517 |
| more_resilient | 0.559 | 74350 |
| more_comfortable | 0.551 | 22222 |
| than_traditional | 0.548 | 55995 |
| more_practical | 0.548 | 55739 |
| be_more_expensive | 0.545 | 50628 |