| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| more_efficient | 0.780 | 7315 |
| be_more_effective | 0.742 | 23128 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.731 | 72275 |
| less_effective | 0.714 | 94770 |
| effective | 0.692 | 1124 |
| more_successful | 0.677 | 34904 |
| more_consistent | 0.670 | 68683 |
| a_more_efficient | 0.668 | 42459 |
| less_costly | 0.666 | 69576 |
| more_useful | 0.662 | 36186 |
| more_productive | 0.653 | 27169 |
| more_responsive | 0.647 | 85647 |
| more_innovative | 0.643 | 79826 |
| more_robust | 0.640 | 33562 |
| an_effective | 0.637 | 8496 |
| more_appropriate | 0.631 | 73659 |
| more_effectively | 0.620 | 13061 |
| efficient | 0.619 | 2805 |
| more_meaningful | 0.616 | 46666 |
| more_powerful | 0.613 | 15945 |
| more_reliable | 0.613 | 30134 |
| the_most_effective | 0.612 | 11159 |
| smarter | 0.609 | 32662 |
| more_flexible | 0.604 | 21612 |
| more_comprehensive | 0.603 | 50667 |