| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| a_more_efficient | 0.793 | 42459 |
| more_effective | 0.780 | 8517 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.756 | 72275 |
| efficient | 0.754 | 2805 |
| less_costly | 0.731 | 69576 |
| more_productive | 0.714 | 27169 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.708 | 26264 |
| more_economical | 0.701 | 84513 |
| more_reliable | 0.700 | 30134 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.695 | 31393 |
| more_efficiently | 0.694 | 19634 |
| more_energy_efficient | 0.684 | 94619 |
| more_sustainable | 0.683 | 25970 |
| great_efficiency | 0.678 | 84913 |
| smarter | 0.676 | 32662 |
| more_responsive | 0.674 | 85647 |
| less_expensive | 0.671 | 25381 |
| the_most_efficient | 0.668 | 31596 |
| more_flexible | 0.666 | 21612 |
| more_convenient | 0.660 | 35407 |
| faster | 0.652 | 5744 |
| more_consistent | 0.646 | 68683 |
| more_useful | 0.644 | 36186 |
| cost-efficient | 0.643 | 81922 |
| more_innovative | 0.642 | 79826 |