| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| more_effectively | 0.850 | 13061 |
| efficiently | 0.797 | 5666 |
| more_quickly | 0.729 | 18929 |
| more_efficient | 0.694 | 7315 |
| more_rapidly | 0.684 | 68123 |
| more_easily | 0.678 | 14970 |
| quicker | 0.671 | 32994 |
| faster | 0.659 | 5744 |
| much_faster | 0.635 | 41917 |
| effectively | 0.620 | 2166 |
| most_effectively | 0.613 | 66592 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.603 | 31393 |
| a_more_efficient | 0.602 | 42459 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.599 | 26264 |
| more_readily | 0.588 | 66607 |
| with_less | 0.588 | 14397 |
| at_low_cost | 0.575 | 43994 |
| productively | 0.573 | 69146 |
| at_a_low_cost | 0.571 | 57241 |
| great_efficiency | 0.568 | 84913 |
| optimally | 0.564 | 56121 |
| to_well_manage | 0.562 | 97409 |
| be_more_effective | 0.559 | 23128 |
| reduce_cost | 0.546 | 15420 |
| save_time_and_money | 0.544 | 76807 |