| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
energy_efficient
|
0.815 |
29579 |
|
energy-efficient
|
0.735 |
52317 |
|
reduce_energy_consumption
|
0.717 |
81333 |
|
improve_energy_efficiency
|
0.704 |
77201 |
|
increase_energy_efficiency
|
0.694 |
97027 |
|
save_energy
|
0.691 |
35825 |
|
more_efficient
|
0.684 |
7315 |
|
more_sustainable
|
0.668 |
25970 |
|
energy_efficiency
|
0.655 |
5081 |
|
environmentally_friendly
|
0.646 |
19984 |
|
to_save_energy
|
0.633 |
84799 |
|
energy_saving
|
0.628 |
17268 |
|
retrofit
|
0.609 |
16237 |
|
energy_usage
|
0.605 |
57767 |
|
energy_use
|
0.605 |
15921 |
|
energy_consumption
|
0.604 |
13950 |
|
environmentally-friendly
|
0.601 |
98360 |
|
energy_efficiency_measure
|
0.593 |
86432 |
|
low_emission
|
0.592 |
91447 |
|
conserve_energy
|
0.591 |
92771 |
|
reduce_carbon_emission
|
0.581 |
71366 |
|
reduce_greenhouse_gas_emission
|
0.578 |
57109 |
|
more_economical
|
0.577 |
84513 |
|
go_green
|
0.575 |
39844 |
|
more_cost-effective
|
0.574 |
72275 |