| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| a_more_flexible | 0.764 | 95010 |
| flexible | 0.735 | 3047 |
| more_robust | 0.691 | 33562 |
| more_flexibility | 0.671 | 94208 |
| more_dynamic | 0.669 | 67394 |
| more_efficient | 0.666 | 7315 |
| more_responsive | 0.662 | 85647 |
| great_flexibility | 0.646 | 93696 |
| more_consistent | 0.641 | 68683 |
| be_very_flexible | 0.629 | 97669 |
| more_transparent | 0.614 | 39889 |
| a_flexible | 0.613 | 15024 |
| more_innovative | 0.612 | 79826 |
| more_stable | 0.610 | 38558 |
| more_intuitive | 0.606 | 97210 |
| more_effective | 0.604 | 8517 |
| less_costly | 0.599 | 69576 |
| more_relax | 0.596 | 89419 |
| more_creative | 0.594 | 53483 |
| increase_flexibility | 0.591 | 69673 |
| more_reliable | 0.588 | 30134 |
| adaptable | 0.588 | 22402 |
| more_open | 0.587 | 16322 |
| more_diverse | 0.586 | 46820 |
| more_cost-effective | 0.583 | 72275 |