Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
the_most_efficient | 0.840 | 31596 |
the_most_effective | 0.677 | 11159 |
efficient | 0.665 | 2805 |
most_effective | 0.633 | 18051 |
more_efficient | 0.618 | 7315 |
an_efficient | 0.603 | 16489 |
the_most_reliable | 0.599 | 55167 |
cost_efficient | 0.582 | 94706 |
very_efficient | 0.578 | 93713 |
highly_efficient | 0.574 | 40901 |
a_more_efficient | 0.569 | 42459 |
most_useful | 0.563 | 24538 |
the_most_convenient | 0.561 | 96003 |
the_most_suitable | 0.557 | 60378 |
cost-effective | 0.556 | 12088 |
most_comfortable | 0.554 | 56628 |
the_most_productive | 0.553 | 62099 |
the_most_profitable | 0.544 | 98319 |
cost_effective | 0.540 | 15101 |
cost-efficient | 0.539 | 81922 |
the_most_appropriate | 0.530 | 24581 |
good | 0.525 | 62 |
more_economical | 0.524 | 84513 |
the_most_advanced | 0.519 | 25775 |
optimal | 0.517 | 8814 |