| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| a_proven | 0.787 | 77007 |
| highly_effective | 0.600 | 35554 |
| cost-effective | 0.531 | 12088 |
| demonstrable | 0.522 | 97206 |
| evidence-based | 0.512 | 27978 |
| cost-efficient | 0.509 | 81922 |
| unproven | 0.508 | 69992 |
| well-established | 0.503 | 26223 |
| be_prove_to | 0.502 | 30126 |
| a_cost-effective | 0.502 | 69744 |
| best-in-class | 0.496 | 97072 |
| reliable | 0.494 | 3190 |
| prove | 0.491 | 2655 |
| research-based | 0.490 | 58420 |
| patented | 0.482 | 33145 |
| verifiable | 0.479 | 45108 |
| cost_effective | 0.478 | 15101 |
| innovative | 0.477 | 2313 |
| industry_lead | 0.477 | 63409 |
| dependable | 0.475 | 21638 |
| track_record_of | 0.472 | 57754 |
| effective | 0.470 | 1124 |
| easy-to-use | 0.466 | 29712 |
| well_establish | 0.464 | 37232 |
| scalable | 0.463 | 14958 |