| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| affordable | 0.750 | 3667 |
| inexpensive | 0.713 | 10926 |
| affordable_price | 0.696 | 69228 |
| an_affordable | 0.687 | 35923 |
| reasonable_price | 0.679 | 80164 |
| cheap | 0.651 | 1957 |
| very_cheap | 0.650 | 94283 |
| at_an_affordable_price_. | 0.638 | 87167 |
| at_affordable_price_. | 0.635 | 65387 |
| more_affordable | 0.626 | 30101 |
| at_affordable_price | 0.620 | 86876 |
| pricey | 0.619 | 35908 |
| at_low_price | 0.601 | 84536 |
| an_inexpensive | 0.594 | 61517 |
| competitive_price | 0.587 | 96515 |
| cheap_price | 0.575 | 69061 |
| cost_effective | 0.569 | 15101 |
| offer_quality | 0.568 | 86448 |
| low-cost | 0.568 | 15096 |
| less_expensive | 0.564 | 25381 |
| low_price | 0.563 | 11233 |
| good_price | 0.556 | 20972 |
| low_cost | 0.555 | 7473 |
| top_quality | 0.554 | 22479 |
| high-quality | 0.552 | 8965 |