| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| waste_reduction | 0.768 | 64360 |
| reduce_energy_consumption | 0.723 | 81333 |
| save_energy | 0.701 | 35825 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.676 | 31393 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.669 | 26264 |
| reduce_cost | 0.668 | 15420 |
| conserve_energy | 0.655 | 92771 |
| reduce_pollution | 0.649 | 88472 |
| save_money | 0.636 | 12850 |
| recycling | 0.635 | 5364 |
| reduce_carbon_emission | 0.634 | 71366 |
| cut_cost | 0.633 | 50131 |
| improve_energy_efficiency | 0.630 | 77201 |
| recycle | 0.629 | 4487 |
| carbon_footprint | 0.629 | 30112 |
| reduce_greenhouse_gas_emission | 0.628 | 57109 |
| resource_efficiency | 0.621 | 54134 |
| increase_energy_efficiency | 0.620 | 97027 |
| zero_waste | 0.614 | 94564 |
| food_waste | 0.611 | 25475 |
| conserve_water | 0.611 | 90141 |
| waste_stream | 0.604 | 52188 |
| environmentally_friendly | 0.602 | 19984 |
| waste_management | 0.595 | 16497 |
| sustainable_practice | 0.590 | 50682 |