| Similarity | Rank |
|---|
|
waste_reduction
|
0.768 |
64360 |
|
reduce_energy_consumption
|
0.723 |
81333 |
|
save_energy
|
0.701 |
35825 |
|
improve_efficiency
|
0.676 |
31393 |
|
increase_efficiency
|
0.669 |
26264 |
|
reduce_cost
|
0.668 |
15420 |
|
conserve_energy
|
0.655 |
92771 |
|
reduce_pollution
|
0.649 |
88472 |
|
save_money
|
0.636 |
12850 |
|
recycling
|
0.635 |
5364 |
|
reduce_carbon_emission
|
0.634 |
71366 |
|
cut_cost
|
0.633 |
50131 |
|
improve_energy_efficiency
|
0.630 |
77201 |
|
recycle
|
0.629 |
4487 |
|
carbon_footprint
|
0.629 |
30112 |
|
reduce_greenhouse_gas_emission
|
0.628 |
57109 |
|
resource_efficiency
|
0.621 |
54134 |
|
increase_energy_efficiency
|
0.620 |
97027 |
|
zero_waste
|
0.614 |
94564 |
|
food_waste
|
0.611 |
25475 |
|
conserve_water
|
0.611 |
90141 |
|
waste_stream
|
0.604 |
52188 |
|
environmentally_friendly
|
0.602 |
19984 |
|
waste_management
|
0.595 |
16497 |
|
sustainable_practice
|
0.590 |
50682 |