| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| suitability | 0.780 | 41243 |
| the_suitability_of | 0.728 | 56520 |
| the_appropriateness_of | 0.553 | 61474 |
| suitable_for | 0.546 | 8377 |
| be_suitable_for | 0.538 | 16494 |
| acceptability_of | 0.524 | 72135 |
| usefulness | 0.504 | 26552 |
| selection_criterion | 0.500 | 37332 |
| feasibility | 0.499 | 20901 |
| that_be_suitable_for | 0.498 | 67543 |
| well_suit_for | 0.496 | 82170 |
| the_feasibility_of | 0.494 | 31863 |
| well_suit_to | 0.492 | 71058 |
| suitable | 0.491 | 5547 |
| appropriateness | 0.491 | 61053 |
| assessment_of | 0.486 | 3371 |
| be_well_suit_for | 0.484 | 44915 |
| be_not_suitable_for | 0.480 | 55734 |
| criterion_for | 0.476 | 10853 |
| applicability | 0.474 | 44277 |
| acceptability | 0.471 | 60504 |
| availability | 0.471 | 4499 |
| adaptability | 0.465 | 20933 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.463 | 58138 |
| be_not_appropriate_for | 0.463 | 97028 |